Rating the Quality of Parenting Plan Evaluations in the Context of Separation and Divorce: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence
by Michael Saini
Family courts routinely turn to mental health professionals (e.g. psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, etc.) to conduct parenting plan evaluations (also known as child custody evaluations or parenting assessments) and provide recommendations about the optimal parenting plans for children and their families within the context of parenting plan disputes post-separation and divorce.
Parenting plan evaluations typically include expert opinions regarding the level of interparental conflict, parent functioning, child-parent relationships, and the children’s developmental, social, emotional, and educational needs post-separation and divorce.
The primary purpose of parenting plan evaluations is to compile information and to formulate opinions pertaining to the custody and/or parenting of children and to disseminate the information and those opinions to the family court, to the litigants, and to the litigants’ lawyers.
Parenting plan evaluations are given considerable weight by the family courts, with the expectation that evaluators integrate the best available scientific evidence and use objective, reliable, and valid procedures. This presentation will highlight the current state of scientific knowledge regarding parenting plan evaluations. An exploration of procedural and methodological considerations will include evidence regarding interviewing parents and children, conducting observations, including third-party evidence, conducting settlement meetings, and making recommendations.
Webinar Structure
Completing this on-demand webinar will result in a 3 CE (3 hours) credits certificate.
In order to earn your credits, you are required to read the content, watch the webinar, complete a survey, and submit a small final assignment.
Michael Saini